Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Anka (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Anka[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently this was deleted in 2015 and recreated. Still not independently notable apart from connections to family members; WP:GNG meets WP:NOTINHERITED. Julietdeltalima (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:24, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or WP:G4 and salt (this will be the third deletion) if no substantial change from the previous version. Doesn't seem to have actually had a job in the interim between this article and the last, so nothing that I see which should change the decision there. Coverage appears mostly (or nearly completely) about her being...around famous people, and a few minor roles and voice overs does not constitute notability. TimothyJosephWood 15:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt for all the reasons listed here! --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.