Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda & Rachel Pace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, move to Amanda and Rachel Pace per naming manual of style. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 03:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda & Rachel Pace[edit]

STRONG delete: They are way too young to be considered remotely notable as per Wikipedia standards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yrgh (talk • contribs) 01:26, 4 December 2006

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, move to Amanda and Rachel Pace, and Expand Age is not a valid deletion criteron. Notability from role as recurring cast member on The Bold and the Beautiful. To other editors, also note other age-related AFDs this user has put up: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Trevor_&_Preston_Shores and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kaia_and_Kendall_Huebner. (This really should have been a bundled nom.) Copysan 13:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment Not necessarily. These two and the Shores kids are young children, who may (I haven't seen their work) actually do some performing. The Huebners are babies, and cannot credibly be labeled as actors. Fan-1967 16:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Actors who have reoccuring roles on two soaps, seems notable to me. Age should not be a factor here. Deathawk 02:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Deathawk. --Oakshade 02:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.