Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alwaysebooks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alwaysebooks[edit]
- Alwaysebooks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references that support notability. No relevant Google hits. PROD declined by author (who has same name of product/organization) with no changes. Could be an A7 speedy, but I thought there was at least a credible claim of importance, even if not notable. Singularity42 (talk) 23:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Delete not notable. Reywas92Talk 00:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete apart from the valid notability concerns, the article also appears to have been created with a conflict of interest by User:Alwaysebooks. ThemFromSpace 00:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy. Spam. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - A7 because the article does not contain any assertions of notability. This company is non-notable. The article even says, "Founded in late 2009 the company is due to launch it's website in November 2009 . . ." This article should be deleted per WP:CRYSTAL. Cunard (talk) 23:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.