Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alves primary school
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Alves, Moray. MBisanz talk 03:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alves primary school[edit]
- Alves primary school (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete. Small school, unreferenced, notability not established. Contested prod. WWGB (talk) 12:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication of notability, no references, nothing. There's nothing to verify where this school exists or even whether it really does exist. --DAJF (talk) 13:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable, bad article. abf /talk to me/ 15:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Alves, Moray. -- Eastmain (talk) 16:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to Alves, Moray per normal practice. TerriersFan (talk) 17:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I have carried out the merge. TerriersFan (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)}[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the village article. Comments like "there's nothing to verify where this school exists or even whether it really does exist" are thoroughly unnecessary. The most elementary Google search instantly proves that this is no fiction. Melodrama adds nothing to AFD discussions. And whether it is a "bad article" or not is utterly irrelevant. Many articles here at Wikipedia are not just "bad" but a total disgrace, however no-one ever doubts that the topic deserves an article. I will not name names... (but, eg, some of the basic agricultural articles used to be plain laughable.) --Mais oui! (talk) 05:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Alves, Moray, where it can be discussed in context until sufficient reliable sources exist to justify an article. Alves, Moray, could certainly use the content/expansion anyway. DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.