Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternator Centre for Contemporary Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No response from Hallows AG, editor appears to be on a break. Nakon 23:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternator Centre for Contemporary Art[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Nothing in the local press except as a location for art exhibits. Just about all the sources are from the Centre itself or from other non-Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless independent sources can be found. This is a classic art gallery/art centre/art space conundrum: there may be plenty of RS available, but they are about the exhibitions, not the gallery. I've had trouble with other artist-run centres, which technically are notable but cannot be verified as such for Wikipedia. Unless there are some RSs available that are about the gallery itself and are more than trivial, sadly this is a delete. freshacconci talk to me 20:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - exhibitions being covered in reliable sources is some indication of notability. As such, I would be inclined to keep if even one reliable source discussing the history (for example) of the centre existed. Sadly, I couldn't find any. Pinging @Hallows AG: who accepted this at AfC for input. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.