Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altair Global Relocation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Altair Global Relocation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A nonnotable business Staszek Lem (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete incidental mentions and non-substantive coverage. Boeing contracts with Altair Global Relocation to furnish its apartments. does not go very far toward meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:CORP for lack of significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete – Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Some coverage exists (e.g. [1]), but not enough to qualify an article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough indepth sourcing. There is some coverage, but it isn't significant. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 18:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as I found some links at News, Books and browser but nothing at all to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.