Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphonse Philippe Mouzon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alphonse Philippe Mouzon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has a very promotional tone to it. Beyond which, the subject fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and WP:CREATIVE. A Google turned up very little on him in the first 10 pages beyond the usual promotional sites. Cited sources fail WP:RS. Claimed award is trivial. Entry in Marquis Who's Who is not generally accepted as evidence of WP:N as their standards for inclusion are lower than Wikipedia's and they get their biographical information directly from the subject. I note for any reviewing editors that I did find quite a bit of information on Alphonse Mouzon, the subject's father, who probably is notable, the poorly written article notwithstanding. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability. Bali88 (talk) 01:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - claim to notability seems to be one appearance in Lethal Weapon and relationship to various family members - this is not enough. GoldenRing (talk) 09:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per GoldenRing, can't find any reliable sources about him. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage from reliable third party sources. While I did some thorough rewriting, there is no indication of notability at all for him. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.