Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphanim
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Arguments for deletion appear to have been successfully refuted. Xoloz (talk) 14:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alphanim[edit]
Delete - No encyclopedic notability proved with a single reference. Stercorariuscyaneusparvulacataphractus (talk) 11:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability issue and too many red links. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 11:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- clearly notable with a 30-second Google News archive search: 93 press mentions, some of them passing or press releases, but still many usable references to establish notability. --A. B. (talk) 16:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per A. B. (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 16:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, there are a number of available sources so notability is hard to question. "Too many red links" isn't cause for deletion, but improvement. Justin chat 17:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This is a quite notable European animation producer. But, the copyright messages are not needed here. Maybe they should be replaced with "co-produced with..." or so. --Mégara (Мегъра) - D. G. Mavrov (talk) 19:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I did that myself, by the way. --Mégara (Мегъра) - D. G. Mavrov (talk) 22:07, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The Google news search performed above indeed has 133 items with the word "Alphanim". The first dozen relate to the company this article is about. The rest don't seem to have a thing to do with it, from a quick base look. Doesn't satisfy my interpretations of WP:N. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 17:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Umm... Not quite. Apparently, some just list animation studios, and include it as one of them. I looked through a few pages and they refer to the studio as a producer of some film, or as an animation studio. So most (if not all) results refer to Alphanim, the animation studio. --Mégara (Мегъра) - D. G. Mavrov (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per User:Justin - --AndrewHowse (talk) 16:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.