Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Zeta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural keep as bad-faith nomination. Carnildo (talk) 01:05, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alpha Zeta[edit]
- Alpha Zeta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable oganization WuhWuzDat 00:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Google News archive turns up a number of articles about their activities, I think that satisfies WP:ORG. The coverage goes back 100 years or so[1][2], so I'm fairly sure notability has been satisfied. Qrsdogg (talk) 01:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Notable organization. My rationale is no more half-assed than this cut-and-paste nomination, which smacks of bad faith and a lack of any research whatsoever. Carrite (talk) 02:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per above comments. NYCRuss ☎ 12:59, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and source♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the above. Clearly a notable organization, given its history. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:26, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- REWRITE - No references. Only links are external links to a chapter and the overall organization websites. Supporters are encouraged to improve sourcing on this prior to annother visit to AfD. Hasteur (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Per the discussion at ANI on the "Bizarre AFDs" by this editor, I urge a SPEEDY PROCEDURAL CLOSE of this and all other clearly bad-faith, automated ALPHA-BLANK-BLANK challenges, without prejudice to the opening of a new AfD debate on the limited number of pages which may well not meet Wikipedia's inclusion standards. Carrite (talk) 17:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.