Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Sigma Phi in the Philippines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 18:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Sigma Phi in the Philippines[edit]

Self-sourced article on a subsidiary of a fraternity. No indication of independent significance. Guy (Help!) 00:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the article should be a disambig page, with separate articles for each of the organizations, since the four different organizations described herein are not linked to each other. My own personal feeling is that fraternities of the North American variety are inherently notable and deserve their own pages. However, the medical school one sounds more like a student club and may not be notable. - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What makes you think a "fraternaty of the North American variety is inherently notable"? From what I know, they're basically just like any other student club, and assuming those notable without making the reasoning for fraternaties worldwide is biased. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Needs referencing and improvement. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 05:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; I think fraternities are inherently non-notable and have seen no reason why this one is an exception. Stifle (talk) 12:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think fraternaties are as notable as any other club, in that without non-trivial coverage RSs they are not. No notability shown here.Yobmod (talk) 11:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.