Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpargatas S.A.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alpargatas S.A.[edit]

Alpargatas S.A. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional. Fails notability guidelines. No reliable secondary sources could be found on the web. RoCo(talk) 15:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane talk 19:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am unsure as to whether or not it has potential. Rollingcontributor I googled it and they are listed on stock markets etc. The Washington State Journal has also talked about them previously. I am certainly not disagreeing that it does seem promotionally written though and is most likely not acceptable in its current state. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, all coverage available merely confirms existence or otherwise appears to be appears to be WP:ROUTINE dividend declarations, factory openings, trademark registrations, etc. No indication of substantial coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.