Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alone Together (TV series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alone Together (TV series)[edit]

Alone Together (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON article about a planned television series which has received a preliminary announcement that it's in development, but has not yet been confirmed as to when (or whether) it will actually air. Lots of ideas enter the production pipeline but never actually come out the other end as completed television series (see, frex, Seth Macfarlane's aborted Flintstones reboot, not to mention the countless pilots that get produced and then passed on), so WP:NMEDIA does not grant a series a presumption of notability on the basis of a production announcement alone: the article does not get to happen until the show has been upfronted as a thing that's definitely going to air. No prejudice against recreation if and when that happens, but until then it's too soon. Bearcat (talk) 01:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to draft space to incubate until such time as notability is achieved. Note that drafts are automatically deleted after a certain period of inactivity. bd2412 T 02:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 02:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.