Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:14, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allied Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, marketing company in search for exposure. The Banner talk 21:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the bad taste shown in adding so many red links (even in Categories) :-). But seriously, this is nothing but a WP:PROMO and I cannot find anything substantial on this company. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: there appears to be some walled garden / COI editing going on. Please see Ramesh Parasuraman which I just proposed for deletion; it was created by the same editor. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:28, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This may be an article created by a fresh editor without much knowledge about Wikipedia that's why many red links. But the Company or Organisation seems to have partnership with many Multinational Companies and it has only its short introduction, so doesn't seems to be only for promotional purpose. Allied Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. would be allowed but the editor need to make necessary changes to the article. Top Infos (talk) 10:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article Ramesh Parasuraman may be an supporting article for Allied Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. as that person is MD of the company. But Ramesh Parasuraman article doesn't seem to meet the guidelines and feels as Promotional Article. Top Infos (talk) 10:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: borderline A7 and G11--not notable, no claim to importance. Drmies (talk) 04:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Necessary improvements have to be made in this Article by the editor. Apsara2016 (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "partnerships" with notable companies means they are one of a notable company's many suppliers or sales agents. This is inherited notability of a particularly absurd variety.The sources are basically PR. Thee is no reason to think thearticle is improvable, for the firm is not notable. DGG ( talk ) 04:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.