Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance for Democracy and Freedom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect can be created if desired. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:23, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance for Democracy and Freedom[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this is a notable political party. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources discussing the subject. ... discospinster _talk 21:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 21:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 21:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or re-direct to Mike Hookem. Maybe the party will be more notable in the future, but for now, I cannot find any reliable secondary sources about them. (There are some primary sources: their own website, a letter in a local newspaper). I don't think we need a complete deletion: we can re-direct to their one famous member, former MEP Mike Hookem. Bondegezou (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Campaign advertisement that is also currently unsourced! (Though that may have been Bondegezou doing cleanup.) Would probably be a G11 candidate if it wasn't already in AfD. Bkissin (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've not removed any sourcing. It's only ever had one source, the party's own website. Bondegezou (talk) 08:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No third party coverage in reliable sources beyond a few appearances in lists. Maybe too soon, so nothing to stop it being recreated once notable. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 18:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing to suggest notability at present. If this were to change in the future then there might be grounds for an article, but not at the moment. Dunarc (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.