Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Weickert
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Allan Weickert[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Allan Weickert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, most coverage was through sports databases. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 21:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 21:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 21:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 21:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the sourcing clearly comes up short of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete While he meets WP:NMMA with three top tier fights, an overall losing record and a highest ever ranking of #130 makes his notability questionable. What cements my decision is the lack of significant coverage to show WP:GNG is met. Databases and routine sports coverage is not sufficient. Papaursa (talk) 01:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.