Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan Wasserman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Allan Wasserman[edit]

Allan Wasserman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Sourced only to IMDb. Adam9007 (talk) 01:29, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:31, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:31, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, lots of credits, but lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. The closest I could find was two sentences in a "where are they now" article.[1]. Nothing in his official resume suggests he'd pass WP:NACTOR. Pburka (talk) 14:50, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No sources are directly about Wasserman. The article doesn't give away enough information about the actor apart from the credits. BetaN2 (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I only wrote this in the first place because I saw there was a French article on him and I think there might have been an AfC request, but I'm not sure. I never ended up being able to put time into expanding it and it doesn't seem like there's that much to expand on anyways.snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 01:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete bit part actors are not notable and IMBd is not a reliable source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.