Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alla Ghilenko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. this has been running for three weeks and there is valid opinion on both sides with regard to continued career garnering coverage and the lack of presumption of notability. Unlikely that consensus is going to emerge with NSPORTS in such flux. Star Mississippi 02:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alla Ghilenko[edit]

Alla Ghilenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough independent in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG at present. Short articles like this, this and this are the best results I can find. Under the new Olympic guidelines, the subject no longer meets WP:NOLY either. JTtheOG (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There is no presumption of notability, so unless editors can find sources that meet WP:GNG this article needs to be deleted or redirected. BilledMammal (talk) 04:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. --Vaco98 (talk) 10:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Based on the sources available in the article, I feel that this satisfies the relevant Wikipedia notability guidelines. Canadian Paul 02:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Since the article is now sourced, I agree with Canadian Paul. --- Løken (talk) 13:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (TCGE) 10:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • KeepI looked at this article a while ago and felt unable to vote. I reviewed it again today and checked out the new sources, specifically the https://asnta.ru/ and the Radio Chișinău one, which in my opinion demonstrate notability. CT55555 (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.