Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All the Stars in the Universe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete two, third one already redirected. Daniel (talk) 08:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All the Stars in the Universe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This editor has created three pages, and duplicated the same page three times. None have references, and the pages basically duplicate existing articles. Does not meet GNG. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for All the Stars in the Universe and All the stars discovered as being covered by existing articles and not a plausible typo/misnomer. Redirect for List of Stars as it is a plausible typo to Lists of stars, similar to List of stars. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 08:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced WP:FORK of Lists of stars. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect List of Stars to Lists of stars. Delete the other two, per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. Ajf773 (talk) 10:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the preceding comment: Redirect List of Stars to Lists of stars, and Delete the other two. Let's also note that the creator of these pages seems to be a new editor who is learning how Wikipedia works, so let's be friendly here. RomanSpa (talk) 13:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A10. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect List of Stars (which already has been done) and delete the other two per above arguments (implausible redirect) Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the first two. Useless, redundant articles; neither are plausible search terms. Dronebogus (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment List of Stars now redirects to List of stars. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per CSD A10. An article that duplicates an existing topic. The title made me think this was a book. enjoyer -- talk 11:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CSD G7 also applies since the author blanked the article. enjoyer -- talk 11:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
...and I just noticed that they've been blocked as well. enjoyer -- talk 11:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.