Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All the Light Above It Too World Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:NTOUR.

Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year! Missvain (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All the Light Above It Too World Tour[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tours become notable if they meet WP:NTOUR, which at the very least requires coverage of the tour as a tour--not just dates and times and opening acts and concert halls and ticket sales and what not. The least important part of such an article, from the point of view of notability, are those details; there is nothing here that discusses the relevant aspects of a concert tour. Drmies (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:17, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This concert tour has clearly met the guidlines for WP:NTOUR, the tour was ranked as a top grossing concert tour of 2017, and clearly has many accolades as well as performers. This page has also been up for years with no problem. It should not be deleted Bigpickleman9999912 (talk) 00:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Pollstar' is a trade publication, not an independent source. And "a top grossing concert"--that Pollstar article lists it at no. 30. That it's been up for years means nothing. Drmies (talk) 21:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but improve the article’s sourcing. At first glance, this article looked ok, but then I noticed that a lot of the references used a are not independent of the subject. A lot of them link directly to the website of the artist in question. WikiJoeB (talk) 03:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The sourcing is bad, so what is the reason to keep it? Drmies (talk) 21:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: suffers from the usual problem of Wikipedia articles about tours, in that it's mostly just a list of dates, which fails WP:NTOUR, and a set list from Setlist.fm, which fails WP:USERG. However, this one at least has some sourced references to Billboard Boxoffice and Pollstar, and the attendance and box office takings could probably be sourced from Billboard, so it could be improved. 95% of Wikipedia articles about tours are even worse than this one. Richard3120 (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there's some small, boilerplate stuff, but I'm not seeing the stuff of notability. It's not notable as a tour. A little about how the concert is eco-friendly, but not much else. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 04:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with Richard3120: just a list of dates that fails WP:NTOUR. Fred Zepelin (talk) 03:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.