Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Wi Doin' Is Defendin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dread Beat an' Blood. JForget 00:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All Wi Doin' Is Defendin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:NSONG. No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Off2riorob (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Having read WP:NSONG I do tend to agree with the above comment. I add some lines on the song to the article either on the album or the artist and I apologise for wasting everyone's time. The article may be deleted now as far as I am concerned. Sorry. We all make mistakes. I will hopefully be wiser in future. Smokey TheCat 20:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, as you are the creator and the main contributor and the user that removed the prod it seems an open and shut case and if a passing Administrator was to delete it we could call it a done deal. Off2riorob (talk) 21:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I placed the original PROD. I appreciate • Gene93k's attachment to the song, and it sounds like an interesting song, and I hope to see more contributions from this editor. And I appreciate his cowboying up on the issue. That said, while there's no hurry to speedy delete, there's no real contention anymore and probably no point in more people looking into this. Herostratus (talk) 00:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Dread Beat an' Blood, as article fails notability criteria for songs. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 13:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect would be fine, no objection here to that. Herostratus (talk) 01:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.