Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All We Need Is Cheez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 22:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All We Need Is Cheez[edit]
- All We Need Is Cheez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:MUSIC. Demos are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found. (Prod disputed as the article was previously deleted via prod.) SummerPhD (talk) 00:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The previous prod deletion has little to no meaning in this discussion. It is likely that I was the one who sent it through prod originally (I can't tell without a mop and bucket). The procedural (I assume...) dispute of the prod is proper. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The demo has not received any coverage as a stand-alone item, beyond downloading and social networking sites, to reach the notability required for a stand-alone article. The demo's existence has been noted at a couple of encyclopedic sites (like this) but listing it at the band's article is all that is needed. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 15:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Demos are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with Doomsdayer. A whole article on it is overkill. Wickedjacob (talk) 19:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.