Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Spent Out

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All Spent Out[edit]

Cannot find any reference to this show and another editor claims it is non-existant. No references and non-notable either way. shotwell 16:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete couldn't turn up anything on imdb, very dubious. Demiurge 19:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No ref to such a show on google. Show not in WF's imdb entry, not in any of his obits. Show not in IMDB. His 'co-star' is not in IMDB. I recall no such show - very improbable that there was such. How to fake entry: copy half a dozen lines about some obscure 70s sitcom from somewhere else, change title, create article, change actors, and a few details, add to Wikipedia. Throw this joker off the site forever! 88888 19:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoaxes are why I tag everything I find without references with {{unreferenced|article}}. Articles remaining thus should be deleted. Edison 21:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find your logic hard to believe - how would anything ever be added if it has to be in Wiki or IMDB first! I added this article BECAUSE there was no existing entry for it. Mary Clark is my aunt and playing Joan Spent was the only significant role she ever had. The article is based on her personal account and the titles were obtained from her scripts. She herself said how cringe-worthy it was, but great fun to make.

If you really don't trust this article then I suggest that you do your own research by contacting Anglia, rather than just rubbishing my work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.225.196 (talk • contribs)

Comment unfortunately we can't do that, because it would be original research, which is forbidden by Wikipedia rules. Nor can we accept your aunt's personal account — we must have a reliable source. Demiurge 11:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.