Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Over the Place (Avril Lavigne album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I advise music/Avril Lavigne editors to check back in a couple of months and feel free to recreate the page when more sources appear, especially ones that confirm the title and other substantial information about the album. The only good source is Billboard, and it merely quotes the title once. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Jamie S93 16:10, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All Over the Place (Avril Lavigne album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball: "Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. While Wikipedia includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products, short articles that consist only of product announcement information are not appropriate. Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s)", and least of all with no references whatsoever. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 03:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is some coverage of Lavigne's new album, e.g. the Billboard article "Avril Lavigne: New Album Is 'All Over The Place'", but the details there are insufficient to support a standalone article, and that article states that the album is still untitled. There's nothing here to merge and the title isn't going to be useful as a redirect. --Michig (talk) 07:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 16:49, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.