Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-New Wolverine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 19:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All-New Wolverine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page should be redirected to X-23#All-New Wolverine. While sources do exist for the topic, the information can easily be housed at X-23 as per WP:CONTENTFORK. TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - The article is about a notable new Marvel Comic series. I feel an on going, continuing series is worthy of it's own Wikipedia entry. Neptune's Trident (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is covered by many sources, and I agree with User:Neptune's Trident, an ongoing, popular series is worth keeping. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 19:20, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep at least for now, this is enough for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.