Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alkemy X, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I will apply salt to both pages. A new article can go through the articles for creation process. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alkemy X, Inc.[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a well disguised advert. Many of the references are regurgitated press releases and PR material. A good number make no mention of the subject of the article. Fails WP:CORP Fiddle Faddle 13:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 13:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 13:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 13:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam. MER-C 16:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, salting Alkemy X as well. Probably paid for, definitely spam and trying to hide it by using different article names. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt both, per Joseph2302. The page creator has been perma-banned for spamming/socking. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete, and salt both titles, please. By the way, snow deletion really is a thing. —Unforgettableid (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, probably should delete as an advert. I will point out two things, however ~ like politicians, even advertisers tell the truth occasionally, no matter how accidentally, and if the claims in the article are true it may (later, if not now) meet GNG, so even if the title is salted, we should be open to a new article in the future; also, i think i've checked every reference (though i'm not completely certain) and contrary to assertion above Alkemy X is mentioned in each; happy days, Lindsay^Hello 14:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.