Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aljin Abella (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Dyaiii... Well, he's a working actor. You've got a profile in the Sydney Morning Herald which is a major paper in a major city... little bio here at Opera Australia website... full-scale magazine interview here, granted I dunno how big a deal Peril Magazine is... and lots of little mentions, including a bit of gossip buzz... He doesn't meet WP:NACTOR but he doesn't have to cos he meets WP:BIO, since "two" = "multiple" and the Sydney Morning Herald piece + the Peril piece + the collection of other mentions... makes the grade in my view. That's not even counting the Power Rangers stuff and the fact that he's continuing to work, unless his career hits a wall he's only gonna get more notable each year... He's a stage actor and that keeps his IMDb stats down... not that they're that bad anyway... Keep. Yes I know the "vote" was 4-2 to delete but even so, keep on strength of argument. (non-admin closure) Herostratus (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aljin Abella[edit]

Aljin Abella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject that appears only minor roles outside of Power Rangers Jungle Fury considers no notability enough. ApprenticeFan work 14:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ApprenticeFan work 07:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ApprenticeFan work 07:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ApprenticeFan work 07:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as not better satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 19:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment no significance in New Zealand - unless significant elsewhere I support delete. NealeFamily (talk) 03:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Notable stage actor.
In addition to a lead in Power Rangers Jungle Fury he plays Monkey in the Australian production of Monkey: Journey to the West [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
His role as Joe in multiple productions of The Sapphires (play) has gained enough attention to call it a significant role. [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] (That subplot appears to have been dropped for the film adaptation).
Was nominated for a 2014 Green Room Award for his role in La Cage aux Folles (Jacob – Butler, a significant role). [17] [18] [19] [20] [21].
Enough for WP:NACTOR. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the sources above are enough for WP:GNG to be passed.There seems to be a trend that stage credits are not being given proper consideration.Atlantic306 (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Not enough to meet WP:ACTOR. Delta13C (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How so? duffbeerforme (talk) 11:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment for Duffbeerforme, I checked the Google search for the actor is only 17,100 hits. As the nominator I made a proposal to be deleted, though it may not still enough with the requirements of WP:NACTOR, thus a person playing in musical theatres are not more considerably notable. ApprenticeFan work 13:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? Can you please try that again. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.