Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison James

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete with the option to redirect if anyone wants to. Hut 8.5 20:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alison James[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed without reason. Concern was Obscure actress. Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG

I concur hence the nom Gbawden (talk) 14:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The actress appears to have received virtually no coverage in reliable sources. She played only one significant role, which is insufficient to pass WP:NACTOR. Rentier (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tiffany Pratt the fictional character portrayed by the actress. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
leaning to Delete - one role in a soap is just not enough to be notable. Redirect is possible, but, though I'm sure others would disagree with me, I'd likely be in favor of deleting the article on the character as well. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 13:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pending further editing. I've just noticed that James is her maiden name and under her married name of Alison Raine she has had more of a career: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0416265/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm MurielMary (talk) 10:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I cant find reasonable and valid references about this article.Mr.ref (talk) 15:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 18:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no SIGCOV found, and one role falls short of notability for the actor. A redirect is unnecessary, as there's no usable article history to preserve. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above, actor known for only one role. The purpose of a redirect is to help people find articles, so the page history is irrelevant. (And even if Tiffany Pratt is deleted, there may be an alternative target.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.