Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alif Allah Aur Insaan (TV series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:TVSERIES (non-admin closure) SahabAliwadia 14:54, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alif Allah Aur Insaan (TV series)[edit]

Alif Allah Aur Insaan (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know why but I think this article which meets WP:TVSERIES, doesn't have any reliable source. Mostly I have found sources are blogs. SahabAliwadia 13:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SahabAliwadia Hello, I am User:Sammy.joseph and I have started editing this article since a month or so, just saw your notice on the page so thought to tell you some stuff. Basically this is a Pakistan TV Series, internet usually doesn't have enough information about these which we would usually term 'reliable', the channel usually shares information on their website and mostly on their facebook or on twitter, alot of information is also available on Imdb but since all these sources are considered less reliable so we usually search for websites which have enough context along with their reliability so it could fit in wikipedia. I have also edited several Pakistani pages before along with fellow users and believe you me there were several articles that had same discussions going on, so after several talks and also a large removal done by senior Users we revamped those pages and came to the conclusion to use these websites. You might have also seen that in the Production section of this article we have mentioned the source and the dialogues quoted are done by the cast members themselves since they were interviewed, to support the same dialogues we have added some of the other sources aswell since they were also interviewing the same person. About these sources being blogs, these are not necessarily blogs, they are just those websites that generally provide television updates, interviews and latest happenings particularly described as a entertainment news website. With what you thought of it being a blog was its review section, they also have these critic reviews which i was suppose to add in the Reception section under the 'Critical appreciation section' along with the critic name and the publisher's source in the future, these sections are typically found in Television series or films.

There was another tag on this page that it needs more grammar improvement, so let me assure you that the plot section is constantly being removed and the anonymous users without user ID are constantly replacing my edits with theirs having lowest grammar. And lastly about the reception section, we once approached a senior editor (administrator) last year where we told him that a Pakistani Television Channel is provided with the TV Rating information by the Audience measurement brands and they typically release informations on their facebook page claiming which brand/Rating Source gave them the information, a consensus was made that we shall only mention fact that rating information was given on the channels/series official facebook page who's link/source will be mentioned on the external links section. Last month a User removed the information and I told about the same fact but since he was not listening and he only needed the channel's source, I added the link just because he was constantly removing with no official reason.

I am trying to make this page better and more informative, i gave you all the information i know and all the edits i do, if you still have queries please let me know here or on my talk page. If this is not the place for discussion please let me know where to discuss. Sammy.joseph (talk)

@Sammy.joseph: Thankyou for your kind and support, keeping article for non-admin closure. But please fix all the issues as said in the page. SahabAliwadia 13:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.