Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Hunters (Warhammer 40,000)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alien Hunters (Warhammer 40,000)[edit]

No real world references or assertion of notability. Fails WP:RS by relying on primary sources. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 14:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also:

Delete. Notability is not established through significant coverage in independent third-party sources. A reasonably recent addition to the game background, there isn't even a complete miniature line on this subject yet (which means it lacks even a real physical presence). Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikipedia:Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, unoriginal research, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Wikipedia is. At worst, it could be merged and redirected without deletion to something associated with this. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —--Craw-daddy | T | 22:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MikeWazowski (talk) 05:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see WP:PERNOM. Thanks! --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 20:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article has been transwikied to the Warhammer 40k wikia by Falcorian. --Craw-daddy | T | 07:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no adequate assertion of notability through significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the topic. The majority of the article is unsourced plot summary. sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 09:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge to Inquisition (Warhammer 40,000) See the Daemonhunters AfD. I consider these a less significant version of the demon hunters (as no codex has been written for them). Article currently represents a bit of WP:PLOT and WP:OR. It is, as should be clear now, not notable per the WP:GNG. Protonk (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Plot summary and in-universe detail without real-world content. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject indicates that the topic is non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:JNN is not a valid reason for deletion when the article is notable to a real world audience and has sufficient coverage for a paperless encyclopedia. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 20:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just not notable was not the reason given for deletion --T-rex 15:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - more cruft with no independent sources --T-rex 15:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ITSCRUFT is never a valid reason for deletion. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.