Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia von Rittberg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:19, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alicia von Rittberg[edit]

Alicia von Rittberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, very few sources that aren't IMDb. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ACTOR. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very weak keep This film has article in Wiki, actors may also? Shad in Net 01:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shad Innet (talkcontribs)
  • Comment @Shad Innet: That isn't a good reason, the person needs to be notable other than just for being in a film, else this article should just be redirected to the film. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep Won a Bavarian TV award (last link) in 2013 for her work in a single TV show. I have no idea of the importance of the award. All of the other links are to IMDB. Since she was clearly a popular TV actress, I'm assuming that there are better sources, although they would undoubtedly be in popular German magazines. The German WP article doesn't have RS that we can use. We need someone who can search Google in Germany, which will probably give more results than I see when searching from within the US. LaMona (talk) 23:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 15:32, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.