Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice in Chains' fourth studio album (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Chains' fourth studio album[edit]

WP:CRYSTAL and STOP - Hammer Time! flaming lawyer 01:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete (G4) as recreation of deleted material. We could have saved some time and tagged it for G4 instead of another AFD. Anyway, it's Hammertime! MuZemike 03:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was like 8 months ago... I don't think that counts... flaming lawyer 04:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

8 months ago, and not the same article. Umbralcorax (talk) 04:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Once it has a title and release date, then create. No Excuses, in a Nutshell, delete. Again. Lugnuts (talk) 09:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete , STOP.......Hammer time. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 21:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete , Directly from Ten Pound Hammer's Law: "There are occasional exceptions to this law, as sometimes a future album will contain enough verifiable information for a decent article even if the title is not known." Also, nothing in the article is crystal balled. 13:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.143.221 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.