Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Alborzi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ali Alborzi[edit]
- Ali Alborzi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article fails in being notable and is an advertisment Ericg33 (talk) 05:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Yes, the article needs expansion and cleanup. However, there are enough in-depth – reliable – verifiable – and creditable sources, as shown here [1], to meet Wikipedia’s criteria for inclusion under Notability. ShoesssS Talk 14:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notability is established, per above. I see no reason to deviate from our usual standards here. WilyD 14:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as notability shown with the most cursory of searches. With respects to the nom, did he not read WP:ATD before making the nomination? The article should certainly been tagged for expansion and sourcing... but sent to AfD? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball Keep. Suggested withdrawal of nomination. DARTH PANDAduel 02:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reliable sources are a little thin, but enough exists to demonstrate notability. Tag and keep. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 14:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.