Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Akbar Ghelich

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. BusterD (talk) 03:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Akbar Ghelich[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Ali Akbar Ghelich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NSINGER. No indication of notability or coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources to denote notability. nearlyevil665 14:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be omitted
Hello, as an Iranian wiki writer, I do not know this gentleman, and he is not known among Iranians either. And the sources mentioned are not enough, also the sources are personal blogs. Adolfzl64 (talk) 13:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Adolfzl64, I have no role in the article's retention or deletion, and I express my opinion as the author of this article.
I have extracted the sources of the article from reliable sites such as Iran's official TV channels [3][4], Tabnakjavan news agency and Iran's official IRIB news agency.In addition, I have included the music of the TV programs that this person was the singer of, from the main archive of Telewebion.[5] And I don't know which of the news are from the blogs that you are saying this. If I have included a blog as a news source, please let me know so I can correct it. Meyboad (talk) 02:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Radio of the Islamic Republic does not have a public audience. It is not valid because no one else is watching except for people like singer Mullahs and... And the government media has no credibility. among Iranians and the world. A media that proudly promotes war, bloodshed, lies and demagoguery, and the lack of women's rights and the LGBT community. There is no media that can give fame to a madah. Adolfzl64 (talk) 07:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your opinion is mixed with politics, while Wikipedia's rules emphasize an unbiased opinion. It is written in the WP:NSINGER: A singer who performed the music of a television program that was broadcasted nationwide can be qualified as an encyclopedia. I have also created it according to the rules. Besides, you said at first that the sources are from blogs, but now you say that Iranian TV is invalid! So why didn't you explain the problem you made to the sources? Meyboad (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think that Nik Salehi and Tabnak Javan are independent and official news agencies? Performing a eulogy and music for a television program of the Islamic Republic It is interesting that dictators are praised. Adolfzl64 (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TabnakJavan has been operating independently as a Persian language news website since 2018, and a large number of Persian Wikipedia sources are also from this website, and it has a standard news process and an editor.[6] (I don't know which faction or political front he is connected to).
Nik Salehi is one of the most visited and old Iranian websites that publishes the biographies of famous Iranian people, and I only quoted the biographical part from this website.
However, I found more reliable sources from Mehr News Agency [7], Young Journalists Club [8], Borna News Agency [9] and ISNA News Agency [10], which are all official news agencies, and I will add these sources to the article. And thank you for making me find better and more reliable sources for the article. Meyboad (talk) 15:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG as I see it, I also have suspicions about it being an UPE article. Tehonk (talk) 02:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Can we focus on the sourcing including examining the new sources that have been added over the course of this AFD discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz there's a consensus for delete here with 3 delete votes, there's no keep other than the article creator, who will be blocked soon as a sock after I post my SPI, so this will be a G5 eligible too after all, I mean there's no need for these relists really. Tehonk (talk) 08:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ali_Akbar_Ghelich&oldid=1209062634"