Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Tsang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Tsang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

simply being a mayor of a small municpality does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. his crimes whilst well reported does not meet WP:CRIMINAL. LibStar (talk) 02:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 06:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I thought about this one for a long time. The article itself, of course, is an utter mess, self-contradictory, overloaded and severely outdated. The vast majority of material I could find was relating to this one scandal, and as such I think Tsang fails WP:1E in addition to the nominator's rationale. The article claims that Tsang was leader of the Unity Party but I have not been able to find evidence of this (perhaps they mean leader on Strathfield Council? In which case so what). If such evidence was found, I might reconsider as Unity had an MP at the time; however, it's more than likely that even so Tsang still doesn't pass. Frickeg (talk) 12:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.