Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfons Maniura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alfons Maniura[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maniura was a soldier who seems to have had the highest rank of sargeant. The article has no sources. I was able to find some name drops in my search for sources but no substantial sources. There really is no actualy claim to notability. Not every seargeant nor every participant in the various events, even collectively, he was involved in rises to the level of notability. I really see no substantial sources and nothing even approaching a claim to notabiliuty. John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:55, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom, I find nothing substantial, only name drops/lists of names. Oaktree b (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - honestly probably could have been suggested as a Speedy Delete, the author didn't even try to put one source! Mathmo ^Talk 15:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Poland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I think the reason for the article is that he was founder of Naprzód Lipiny, not that he was an army sergeant! Neither the nominator nor either of the contributors above seems to have considered this, focusing only on his military career. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:49, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- That is another unsourced article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Indeed. But that does not invalidate my point that the deletion nomination was based on a false premise. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:49, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no news coverage. Samanthany (talk) 01:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BASIC. Mztourist (talk) 06:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 01:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.