Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfin Tuasalamony
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Alfin Tuasalamony[edit]
- REDIRECT Alfin Ismail Tuasalamony
- Alfin Tuasalamony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was that the article failed WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. player doesnot play in fully professional league, see WP:FPL for list details. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL. — Joaquin008 (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails guidelines due to not having played at a sufficiently high level. C679 20:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means he fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.