Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Wallace (UCLA Student)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. I am speedy deleting this. The result of this AFD is a no-brainer, and allowing this article to exist (and be caught by mirrors) simply adds to add publicity to a newstory of a stupid girl who made a life-wrecking self-destructive mistake. A racist rant on youtube is WP:NOT encyclopedic. The fact that it made a couple of newsheadlines is covered by WP:NOTNEWS. In the unlikely event this story gains traction, we can debate it again in a few weeks. Scott Mac 09:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Wallace (UCLA Student)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Textbook case of an individual notable for only one event, and so not deserving of an article. The event itself is unlikely to receive lasting coverage, meaning a move is unlikely to be appropriate. Note that this article was created before at Alexandra Wallace (student), but was deleted under G10. -- Lear's Fool 08:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per BLP1E policy cited by nominator. VQuakr (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 08:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 08:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per BLP1E policy. Also from news media the subject unintentionally released it to the world and now she has recanted her video. Article if it stays will potentially risk being coattrack and vandalism and served as a lightning rod for people who has nothing better to do on wikipedia. --Visik (talk) 08:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It has been, you'll notice the history of Alexandra Wallace was so badly vandalised that many of the page revisions had to be suppressed. -- Lear's Fool 08:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - texbook BLP1E case, and a magnet for abuse that has necessitated suppression. Nothing else needs to be said - Alison ^❤ 09:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.