Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Beaton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 20:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Beaton[edit]

Alexandra Beaton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an actress, who has a potentially valid WP:NACTOR claim but does not have the reliable sourcing needed to carry it. While she has had one reasonably significant role in one television series, all of her other listed roles to date are as supporting characters so minor that they don't even have names -- and if you're going for "notable because she's had roles", rather than "notable because she won an award for one of them", then it takes more than just one role. And the only reference present here for anything is a single Q&A, which is a source that could be used for supplementary confirmation of facts after GNG had been met by stronger sources, but cannot bring the GNG on its own as it represents the subject talking about herself. As always, an actress is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because a "significant" role has been claimed; she gets a Wikipedia article when she can be reliably sourced over GNG as having garnered media coverage for the role. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom (although I would also be fine with moving this page to draft space to see if further work can be done on it). bd2412 T 00:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.