Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Adornetto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. extransit (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Adornetto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rejected speedy deletion G11. Should be assessed at AfD. I express no personal opinion on this. Polargeo (talk) 10:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Favonian (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Favonian (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article appears to be well sourced. The subject has published op-ed pieces and received some international attention. [1][2][3][4]Eudemis (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete [comment redacted per WP:BLP, doesn't give any real reason for deleting]58.160.82.98 (talk) 14:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep multiple independent mentions. Misarxist (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Multiple source mentions, clearly over the notability bar. Carrite (talk)
Keep sources provided look adequate, as well a search at PW seems to indicate good coverage. Jujutacular ^T · C 13:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is not a whole lot of coverage, but it is spread over the period of several years and, in at least a few cases, is fairly detailed. Passes WP:BIO, even if the case is not very strong. Nsk92 (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficient reliable sources to show notability. Edward321 (talk) 01:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.