Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Tucker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator Article references improved Mayalld (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Tucker[edit]

Delete nn musician with no reliable sources. Mayalld (talk) 15:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Only nn in the opinion of deleter. Tucker is well known in the worldwide psych-folk scene, has received notices in mainstream media and has collaborated with legendary figures such as Stephen O'Malley. I am adding sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie runout (talk • contribs)

Comment notability isn't a matter of opinion. It is a matter of policy. Wikipedia policy (WP:BAND) describes what constitutes notability. This guy appears not to meet the requirements. If he has received non-trivial coverage (articles about him, rather than articles that mention him in passing) in the mainstream media, then add these sources to the article. Mayalld (talk) 15:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply Multiple references added. Jamie runout (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Citations have been added; meets WP:BAND. Bondegezou (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly meets point 5: "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).". --TheoGB (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn References now satisfy notability Mayalld (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.