Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Stoll
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alexander Stoll[edit]
- Alexander Stoll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a musician (and veterinarian?) that does not meet notability. The assertion of notability appears to be for the subject's work in music and not in the veterinary sciences. There is a citation to "The Veterinary Record" which does nor appear to be available online. The subject does not appear to be signed to any label. Looking on the subect's web site, there is no indication of any released albums; only some tracks on Soundcloud. I can find no significant coverage about this person to supplement the interview noted in the article. Whpq (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per quality guidelines. The references are 100% appropriate, unless this article can be fixed. SwisterTwister talk 22:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article is not in line with the notability guidelines. Lacking in citations and the few present are not verifiable. --Orman.michael (talk) 02:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.