Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Rivkin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 16:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Rivkin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No dedicated coverage of Rivkin can be found in reliable sources. Does not meet WP:BASIC. Binksternet (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if his work was regarded as so important there would be more GS cites. Fail WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete If his work was as important as claimed, there would be more notice of him in quality third-party independent sources. I can't find anything else about him other than what shows here, none of which is particularly notable. This article was previously deleted in 2009 and rose from the dead at the hand of an editor listed as a member of the en:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of MusicLover650. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Essentially promotional article. DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I son't see anything that points to any notability. The list of memberships is kind of a giveaway that this is an overblown article. --Randykitty (talk) 14:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Entire source list is ephemera. Agricola44 (talk) 16:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.