Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Paterakis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Paterakis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable declared politician lacking significant coverage to establish notability. Fails WP:1EVENT. One reference is a dead link and the others are a duplicate. reddogsix (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not yet notable, if he makes headway in the election than maybe but not yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't meet WP:GNG or even WP:NPOL. One citation is an invalid page on the State Board of Elections site; "more references" turns out to be 3 different copies of the same press release, added first by a now-blocked user, followed 2 days later by a new account. (Maybe those sites should go on the wiki blacklist if they don't distinguish between journalism and press releases.) --Closeapple (talk) 07:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A person does not get a Wikipedia article just for being an as-yet-unelected candidate in a future party primary; if you cannot demonstrate that he already had enough preexisting notability to get a Wikipedia article on other grounds (e.g. having already held another notable political office, or having passed our inclusion criteria in some other occupation), then he does not get an article because politics until he wins the gubernatorial election. Bearcat (talk) 16:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:POUTCOMES. We can't have an article on every run of the mill candidate. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons listed above. ALPolitico (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Way too soon and the individual does not meet our criteria for WP:ANYBIO. Mkdw ^talk 05:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We can't create an article for every candidate for office. Revisit if he is making headlines a year from now. SOXROX (talk) 17:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.