Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Krämer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Krämer[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed for deletion by User:Cardiffbear88 due to failing WP:NPROF, deprodded with no rationale/argument. I concur that the subject is likely not notable. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Marginal case. I might be more favorable if there were a GS profile. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as the original nom for PROD. Unsourced article with no claim to notability, and no evidence of reliable sources that could be added. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 08:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet any of the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He's got two books with reasonable WorldCat holdings. But I was only able to find one review for a possible WP:NAUTHOR case [1]. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't seem to pass WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 07:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as non-notable academic. --Lockley (talk) 20:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yes, he published at least one book and a lot more. However, there are no good reviews about his work and very little information about him personally based on 3rd party RS. It is even hard to say what he is notable for. My very best wishes (talk) 21:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.