Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexa Goddard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 23:41, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alexa Goddard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The following person is not notable. Songs are only released on YouTube, and she has topped the UK charts only 2 times. Not acceptable. Illuendo (talk) 13:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep The very fact that she has topped the UK charts twice means that she is notable, per criterion 2 of WP:MUSICBIO. A Thousand Doors (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've rechecked, and she's actually topped the UK Indie Chart just the once. That still makes her notable, of course. A Thousand Doors (talk) 20:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per A Thousand Doors and WP:MUSICBIO.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - the AFDs raised on Pomplamoose, Me at the zoo and Alexa Goddard appear to be deliberately disruptive rather than raised for any good reason. The nominator has been warned and I suggest this AFD is closed on this basis. Fæ (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Nominator is disruptive troll.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 09:46, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on my comment, I think what happened here is that nom had some of his contributions challenged, and he made some pointy challenges.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 21:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per A Thousand Doors and WP:MUSICBIO, which are sufficient reasons. Motivation or actions of the nominator need not be mentioned for the decision to keep. I nominated this article for rescue to attract attention to the merits of the article.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- We can and should start from a position of assuming good faith for any nomination, however this does not overrule all consideration of m:What_is_a_troll?#Misuse_of_process or preclude associated action (such as early closure of an AFD) when there is a blatant larger pattern of misuse. Fæ (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Top the charts makes you notable. I don't think the nominator was sincere when they nominated this for AFD. Dream Focus 15:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per the above mentioned points. --Another Type of Zombie ^talk 15:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.