Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Vann
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete - hoax. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alex Vann[edit]
- Alex Vann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't find any evidence online that this person exists. ISBNs do not match books by that name. Worldcat lists no such books under any ISBN, and Google Scholar hasn't heard of this "academic". Unreferenced, non-notable per WP:ACADEMIC. Probable WP:HOAX. MuffledThud (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 12:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Almost certainly a hoax. I looked around and also found no evidence of existence of either the author or the books. Kinoq (talk) 13:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Anyone who doubts that this is a hoax can search the Cambridge University Press catalogue (and someone should have a word with the CUP about their spelling). Phil Bridger (talk) 14:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 19:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.