Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex S. Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alex S. Johnson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Interesting. I just semi-protected this from serial blanking, then removed a section or two for being fluffy and unverified, to discover that there actually isn't anything here that makes me thing this person passes the GNG or the AUTHOR guideline. He wrote some short stories and a thesis--but that is not enough to be notable by our standards. Drmies (talk) 04:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made this for a former boyfriend. None of it is true. That is why I was trying to take it down. It is totally false information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:1F06:D9C:69FA:C6:D84C:42D9 (talk) 04:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, that's exciting. Anyway, there's little to do but wait this out, since the information doesn't seem to be totally made up. You could nominate it for deletion yourself, but only if you log in to the account that created it. Tell you what, there's one other option--there isn't much of a claim to notability anyway, so speedy deletion is an option. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 04:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of the publications are in worldcat, but I wouldnt have expected they were. Assuming alll of it is actually true, he is not notable, so I don;tthink there's any problem deleting it. DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing available to establish notability. I read an interview with him on a blog, which somewhat supports the IP's claim of making at least some of this up. I am One of Many (talk) 00:50, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.