Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Resume Parser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Resume Parser[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodding. Even though this particular piece of software might not be notable, I think there should be an article about this general type of software; if such an article exists, then I recommend merging instead. In either case, I seek consensus before deletion. Bwrs (talk) 01:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The few sources that I have found seem to focus more on the company that makes and distributes the software and less on the software itself. And none of those sources seem to provide much in the way of notability --Dlrohrer 2003 04:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:14, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I can't find much but advertisements. --NortyNort (Holla) 11:53, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep This is a type of software product thats not generally known to even the computing fraternity, of which i'm one. Its a highly specialized software type that's as far as your run of the mill database or word processor as is a Tiger is to a Canary. As such I think that establishes notability, and the article should be kept and expanded. scope_creep (talk) 02:58, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Being obscure does not make a subject notable. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- There is no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.