Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandrina Ávila Ortiz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandrina Ávila Ortiz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NPROF. The references provided are mere mentions of Ortiz. I looked at the refs used in the article about her in the Spanish Wikipedia and those didn't help. A Google scholar search and a general Google search didn't unearth anything new. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 16:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 16:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 16:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 14:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 14:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 04:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My search didn't find the coverage necessary to show she meets WP:GNG and my search in Google Scholar showed an h index of 4, which is not enough to meet WP:NPROF. Papaursa (talk) 20:32, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Taxonomy is a low-citation subject, but we can't base an article merely on her having accomplished the entry-level task of a taxonomist (finding and naming a species) and there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.