Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleit Swanepoel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Also eligible for speedy deletion under G5, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ErnestCarrot. MER-C 18:29, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aleit Swanepoel[edit]

Aleit Swanepoel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't pass WP:GNG. Article was speedied in 2015 Not enough has changed since then to warrant it. Mostly passing mentions due to a wedding but other than those passing mentions still is as unnotable as it was when it was speedied in 2015. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 06:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 07:00, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 07:00, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: As creator of the page, he has been covered in IOL as well, [1] which is a notable site itself, has quite coverage at local level. Although it can be edited to meet Wikipedia requirements. Vitalguy3x (talk) 07:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 19:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. Book does not appear to be reviewed anywhere so fails WP:NAUTHOR. Only thing there's a business puff piece. SportingFlyer talk 21:36, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.